IELTS Writing Task 2
The Essay Question:
Some people claim that traditional games had more benefits for children than modern ones.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The Essay Answer
That the games played by children traditionally, offered greater merits vis-a-vis those of this age, is what is contended by few. I fully agree with this opinion, since such old games indulged in by children needed little money, albeit being rich in education and fun.
Advocates of the view that modern games are beneficial, argue that such games are designed for the present day young ones, which develop their brains in the required manner, enabling them to tackle current challenges. They cite the example of computer or video games that polish motor and kindred abilities of children that is the need of the hour.
On the contrary, the present day computer and mobile games, are burdensome on the eyes of a child due to the harmful radiations emitted and often leads to a weakening eyesight. Thus, it can be seen that many school going pupils more often than not, don eye glasses at a very tender age. According to reports, the number of children wearing spectacles has steeply risen in the past decade.
Furthermore, the games of yore, like hide and seek, chasing each other in open areas, kabaddi, aiming and hitting a pile of delicately balanced stones to win points, amongst others, provided the much needed exercise, fresh air and interpersonal bonding, apart from loads of fun. Additionally, these games required minimal expenses unlike the modern games. For example, one hour of playing kho-kho in the open environment, the commonly played game in India for centuries, needs no sporting gears, nonetheless proffers greater advantages of healthy air, ample physical exercise and entertainment, besides fostering a spirit of unity.
To conclude, I totally believe the traditional games engaged in by children are more meritorious as compared to the modern ones, since they offer multiple plus points like health and joy.